Writing: On Habits, I

“We are what we repeatedly do”—Aristotle

Habits define who we are. Indeed, as the old saying goes,

Watch your thoughts, they become words;
watch your words, they become actions;
watch your actions, they become habits;
watch your habits, they become character;
watch your character, for it becomes your destiny.”

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nMs3HrxGRgk

We tend to identify ourselves by our profession, religion, association, race, nationality, culture, etc. But aren’t these identities also a collection of habits that one expects from or react to others? They make it possible for individuals and society to function efficiently. For individuals, habits reduce regular activities to routines, saving energy for uncertain, demanding tasks. For a society, habits program us to act in certain ways that minimize transaction costs. Imagine how different you will behave in a hippy bar and a library. The society has instilled in us the habits of tailored behavior for particular contexts.

Business people understand the potency of habits. They develop products and reward programs that aim at hooking you up, get you addicted. Pretty evil, isn’t it? Indeed, the whole fashion industry is built on this idea.

Actors also understand habits well. Many of them practice method acting. It is a technique that requires the actors to relive the character’s life, in order to reach the character’s emotions and psyche. Look at how Chris Bale and the like get their characters right.

http://www.oddee.com/item_99013.aspx

Day 93, 6pt, 12.19S:

jog: 3m;

learn: 0;
swim: 20r;
work on T’s reference letter, Pelican, 9:30am-12pm;
lunch at home;
read: the book "keys to great writing", 3pm-5:30pm;
finish and submit T’s letter online, 7pm-8:30pm;

For Day 94:
review the NRL paper;

GC: fill all the forms;

read AO’s draft;

Writing: TQ2

This project seeks to make two points: (1) customers’ waiting behavior is context dependent, and (2) he may change mind over time. It models two new features: the partial information environment, and the dynamic decision making.

But these alone would not make the top journal: its analysis follows the footstep of XGO’s work. We must do more to strengthen the case. Instead of assuming two customer behaviors—context dependency and dynamic decision making—we can distill them from the data. Fortunately, KK has the bank data. If used properly, they can provide direct connection between theory and practice. Taken together, the data and model should make a compelling story.

We have drafted the model part. It remains to show that existence of dynamic behavior in practice. Though simple, this step is crucial to sell the story. Now KK has drafted the empirical part. Next week, he will integrate it with the modeling part. Afterwards, it is my turn to finish the project.

Above all, we are still struggling with our punch line.